> I was messing around with a large language model,
> Again, my assumption was basically that this was just the language model generating a really elaborate narrative.
> That doesn't mean I believe it was actually a non-human intelligence. I can't prove that. I can't even establish that the material came from anything other than the language model itself.
> Or maybe there's something else going on. I don't know.
I think that's the textbook case of AI psychosis..
> Again, my assumption was basically that this was just the language model generating a really elaborate narrative.
> That doesn't mean I believe it was actually a non-human intelligence. I can't prove that. I can't even establish that the material came from anything other than the language model itself.
> Or maybe there's something else going on. I don't know.
I think that's the textbook case of AI psychosis..