10 comments

  • drob518 1 minute ago
    One problem we’re going to have with AI hardware is coming up with a standard set of specifications that are comparable. I don’t really care about the CPU GHz and the memory bandwidth, at least not directly. What I really want to know is how many tokens per second this will deliver, but that also depends on the model. We need a standard metric for that. Perhaps we agree on a specific open weight model (e.g. GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen vWhatever) and then measure TPS on the hardware of interest.
  • 10729287 26 minutes ago
    The two made-in-Japan, premium grade, Fujitsu laptops I had to work with were by far the worse pieces of electronic I have ever used. Both exhibited identical defects: fans running continuously at maximum speed, and the batteries would completely die within hours of the devices being powered off. Windows or Linux. And don't talk about that tiny unresponsive trackpad to me. Never again.
    • dijit 21 minutes ago
      The Fujitsu Lifebooks were legendary for their robustness back in the day, I'm genuinely sad you had that experience.

      The only fujitsu laptops I used was back in 2011- it was a budget version for on-call and it was fine..

      Sounds like the fans running 100% probably contributed significantly to the issue here. If I had to guess it was likely that the C-States were disabled in BIOS somehow so the CPU clock was running at full tilt the whole time, maybe combined with a bad thermal paste job.

      I'm not here to defend Fujitsu but I've had really bad experiences with basically every major laptop brand (Dell: majorly bad coil whine and especially faulty soldered RAM, HP: keys vanishing from the keyboard and very weak hinges that break all the time, Apple: The GPU unsoldering itself and the butterfly keyboard shenanigans).

      I don't really know any brand with a flawless track record sadly.

      Before anyone brings up Thinkpads, they're trading on a reputation that hasn't been true for over a decade. If you have fond memories of a thinkpad it's most likely that you had it from before 2016, or it's "fine", but certainly not great.

      • nhubbard 6 minutes ago
        I do recall that Fujitsu had a very... unique approach to exposing the Setup option in their firmware. It was just a UEFI boot entry. If that entry was removed, you couldn't get back into the firmware setup; you had to find the name of the setup EFI file and then run that from the EFI console.
    • dwroberts 10 minutes ago
      Their consumer electronics arm is completely unrelated and also majority owned by Lenovo
  • alightsoul 43 minutes ago
    Fun fact, Fujitsu used to run their own fabs in Japan until they were sold to UMC and now they're another UMC fab although they are stuck at like the 20nm node. So this is likely made at JASM.
    • iicc 38 minutes ago
      I think they'd say if the CPU was fabbed in Japan, instead there's some very "careful" wording:

      >next-generation CPU, FUJITSU-MONAKA [1], designed and developed in Japan

      >Fujitsu MONAKA Server, powered by the FUJITSU-MONAKA CPU, enhances sovereign capabilities through domestic manufacturing,

      • iicc 30 minutes ago
        >FUJITSU-MONAKA utilizes a 3D-stacked architecture with a state-of-the-art 2nm process for the core and a 5nm process for the cache and I/O sections.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Advanced_Semiconductor_M...

        >The Phase 2 factory was under construction as of January 2025, next to the Phase 1 facility, and is expected to be completed by 2027.[3] Initially planned for manufacturing semiconductors using a 6 nm process, 3 nm was incorporated into production plans for 2028 in 2026

  • rwmj 53 minutes ago
    It's Arm based, although they barely mention that.
    • minimeow 38 minutes ago
      Yes the lack of transparency on ARM architecture and the obfuscation of the RAM capacity with just the slot information is annoying. Not sure if it is deliberate to sell this at a premium to "mainframe" customers or whether its just their marketing folk not being on the ball. Fascinated by the fact Japan has a 2nm process node but I suspect that too is marketing. Perhaps the 2nm portion of the chip is done at TSMC and the rest of the package done in Japan or something like that. It's not like there's a plethora of 2nm Fabs around the planet to choose from.
    • titzer 7 minutes ago
      They actually do not in that article. I had to look elsewhere to find that out. Weird, one would expect that a big announcement like this would probably need to be vetted against licensing agreements with Arm that would probably want that fact to be prominently highlighted in press releases.
    • nubinetwork 19 minutes ago
      If they didn't mention SVE2, I wouldn't have known either... that would make it arm9 at the earliest...
    • thebeardisred 45 minutes ago
      Thanks I was, of course, looking and very curious what their tool chain story will be.
    • runmanny 42 minutes ago
      [dead]
  • redlewel 33 minutes ago
    Would be cool to get ahold of one of these in the US.

    I do find it odd that the 2U model has less storage capacity than the 1U on their chart. That doesn't make much sense to me.

  • Youden 43 minutes ago
    Where are the CPUs fabbed? They make a big deal about "sovereign" but is the CPU actually made in Japan, or do they rely on TSMC?

    Also odd how big an emphasis they put on AI inference when they don't build the GPU?

    • DashAnimal 30 minutes ago
      According to a Feb press release, they're fabbed by TSMC:

      > For FUJITSU-MONAKA, the 2nm semiconductors will tape out next year. Due to this, Rapidus would be unable to meet the deadline, so TSMC is handling the manufacturing.

      Source: https://global.fujitsu/en-global/pr/news/2026/02/12-01?utm_s...

      According to Rapidus webpage, they are explicitly starting mass production of their 2nm in 2027.

      Source: https://www.rapidus.inc/en/iim/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

    • nicce 35 minutes ago
      > put on AI inference when they don't build the GPU?

      GPU in AI world is essentially a set of specific matrix calculations that this CPU supports on hardware-level. Thought memory speed seems low.

    • Max-q 40 minutes ago
      The article says that it’s manufactured in Japan.
      • ranger_danger 36 minutes ago
        where exactly does it say that? I don't consider "designed and developed in Japan" to be the same as manufactured there
        • bradyd 34 minutes ago
          At the very top of the article: "Achieving world-class AI inference performance through Japan-developed 2nm 3D-stacked CPU and server integrated, developed, and manufactured in Japan"
          • hobofan 20 minutes ago
            Pretty sure it's worded in a way that it applies only to the server, so it should be read as two distinct things:

            - Japan-developed 2nm 3D-stacked CPU

            - server integrated, developed, and manufactured in Japan

          • sgerenser 29 minutes ago
            "Japan-developed CPU..." plus the server itself (parts, power supplies, case, etc.) integrated, developed and manufactured in Japan. It sounds like they're weasel-wording it a bit, but I don't think the CPU itself is manufactured in Japan, only "developed."
  • pipes 19 minutes ago
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Post_Office_scandal

    Their software is so poor that it caused probably the biggest miscarriage of justice in history. Well that and Fujitsu staff colluding with post office executives to put innocent people in prison rather than admit there was a problem

    • Maken 9 minutes ago
      The 'Fujitsu' that made the shitty software was a British consulting company that was acquired by Fujitsu [1] to farm public contracts. This is made by the Japanese parent company.

      [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Computers_Limite...

      • nisegami 4 minutes ago
        You're right, but the scandal is so upsetting that I personally cannot ever look at Fujitsu the same way even. Also, I think you're neglecting that a large part of why it became so bad was that Fujitsu claimed there was no issue with their software. Even if it were built by a company they acquired, the response to the developing situation was something that the parent company should have stepped in to oversee.
    • varispeed 14 minutes ago
      I wouldn't trust that this CPU can do maths properly.
  • varispeed 16 minutes ago
    Never buy products of this dodgy company.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Post_Office_scandal

  • kittikitti 10 minutes ago
    I think what's most notable about this for me is the reduced environmental impact. The specifications list liquid-cooling as optional and it highlights the CPU as the main processor instead of a power hungry GPU. My takeaway is that the next generation of AI HPC's will focus more heavily on sustainable operations.
  • sherujgr 52 minutes ago
    Iam very curious as to how well it'll perform outside of Asia.
    • esafak 47 minutes ago
      And if they'll sell it, seeing as they market it as 'sovereign AI'.