4 comments

  • Pawenniag 8 minutes ago
    Whether the data will actually be affordable and usable enough for smaller participants or whether it mainly improves tooling for institutions that already had decent access
  • greengreengrass 41 minutes ago
    Disappointing that it seems difficult to actually sign up for – "real-time view" hidden behind layers of legalese and licensing, although it's pleasing to see the fees are effectively nothing for individuals or small firms. They're not exactly in the SaaS-era of live demos or trivial sign-ups for immediate access, are they?

    Why do we insist on actually useful interfaces into the economy and banking system being hidden behind such bureaucratic complexity? It's like the Open Banking gift that keeps on giving – if it were truly "Open", I'd have an API I could actually use to talk to all of my banks, rather than what feels like a closed shop (certainly for the average retail individual who just wants a feed from their bank).

    • Pawenniag 5 minutes ago
      This is the frustrating pattern with a lot of "open" financial infrastructure
    • cjs_ac 31 minutes ago
      There’s also a lot of bureaucracy involved in participating in the gilt market directly, rather than using an intermediary.

      https://www.dmo.gov.uk/investor-information/retail-investors...

      I don’t think the Treasury really wants to deal with amateurs.

      • Pawenniag 3 minutes ago
        That's probably true
      • pjc50 25 minutes ago
        No, but you can hold them through the standard range of intermediaries and still get the tax advantage.

        NS&I offer a range of retail products - https://www.nsandi.com/guaranteed-returns is a good option but does NOT come with the tax exemption.

  • stephenheron 2 hours ago
    https://ets-connect.co.uk/ < Slightly more information here.
  • gib444 1 hour ago
    Will this help us see how badly Burnham bungs bonds in real time? I jest I jest