Google Revisits JPEG XL in Chromium After Earlier Removal

(windowsreport.com)

41 points | by eln1 2 hours ago

3 comments

  • caminanteblanco 29 minutes ago
    My introduction to JPEG-XL was by 2kliksphillip on YouTube, he has a few really good analyses on this topic, including this video: https://youtu.be/FlWjf8asI4Y
  • charcircuit 1 hour ago
    Here are the direct links:

    blink-dev mailing list

    https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/WjCKc...

    Tracking Bug (reopened)

    https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40168998

  • mikae1 1 hour ago
    The final piece of the JPEG XL puzzle!
    • free_bip 1 hour ago
      It's a huge piece for sure, but not the only one. For example, Firefox and Windows both don't support it out of the box currently. Firefox requires nightly or an extension, and on Windows you need to download support from the Microsoft store.
      • JyrkiAlakuijala 28 minutes ago
        Would PDF 2.0 (which also depends JPEG XL and Brotli) put pressure on Firefox and Windows to add more easy to use support?
        • jchw 23 minutes ago
          I don't think so: JPEG 2000, as far as I know, isn't generally supported for web use in web browsers, but it is supported in PDF.